September 2003 Medical News
|
A Virus moves West(and North, and South....) | By Janet GinsburgHumans, birds, and mosquitoes propelled the spread of West Nile Virus in the US from coast to coast in less than four years. Various secondary cycles played a part as well. (see West Nile: The Virus that Came to Stay) Map adapted from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data; other information compiled by Janet Ginsburg (jgstories@yahoo.com). |
The Evolution of Varicose Vein Treatmentfrom ACS Surgery:
Principles & Practice
Posted 09/09/2003 William H. Pearce, MD, FACS
Today, the common clinical problem of varicose veins can be addressed using a variety of techniques. Treatments range from the standard surgical therapy of high ligation and stripping of the greater saphenous and tributaries to sclerotherapy, laser vein ablation, and vein closure devices. As the technique has evolved over time, microphlebectomy has been used to remove varicosities below the knee, and the greater saphenous is stripped from the groin to the knee. AblationThe two newest technologies--laser vein ablation and radiofrequency vein ablation--have challenged traditional surgical thinking about varicose veins. Instead of high ligation, both of these devices are placed intraluminally in close proximity (< 2 cm) to the saphenofemoral junction. Either by heat generated from the laser or by radiofrequency, the vein is ablated from the groin to just above the knee. The saphenofemoral branches are left intact. Microphlebectomies are used for the varicosities below the knee. Many studies have documented excellent cosmetic outcomes; however, there are a few reports detailing recannalization, arterialization, and deep vein thrombosis. Recently, another device has become available for the treatment of varicose veins. This device is an illuminated power phlebectomy system that identifies the varicose veins and resects them. This technique is generally used in conjunction with the standard high ligation and surgical stripping to the knee. Early results are also promising. Spider VaricositiesSclerotherapy remains the mainstay of the treatment of spider varicosities. However, several reports have documented its efficacy for large vein varicosities. Similar to other vein ablation systems, the ability to eradicate all branches at the saphenofemoral junctions is somewhat limited by this technique. Like all of the procedures described above, sclerotherapy has advocates as well as critics. Limitations of EvidenceSince many of these procedures are performed for cosmetic reasons, the impetus to conduct a randomized prospective study is limited. In addition, as a result of successful marketing, patients are directing their care and probably would not likely participate in such trials. When such gaps in evidence collection become apparent, practitioners must step forward and take the lead in providing valuable data to better assess both short-term and long-term results. Thus, it is important for practitioners to keep accurate records of patient outcomes, particularly when late outcome becomes important. Although the immediate result of these new techniques may be gratifying, late recurrence must be documented. BibliographyCheshire N, Elias SM, Keagy B, et al: Powered phlebectomy (TriVex) in treatment of varicose veins. Ann Vasc Surg 16:488, 2002 [PMID 12085123] Merchant RF, DePalma RG, Kabnick LS: Endovascular obliteration of saphenous reflux: a multicenter study. J Vasc Surg 35:1190, 2002 [PMID 12042730] Min RJ, Zimmet SE, Isaacs MN, et al: Endovenous laser treatment of the incompetent greater saphenous vein. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12:1167, 2001 [PMID 11585882] Tisi PV, Beverley CA: Injection sclerotherapy for varicose veins. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD001732, 2002 [PMID 11869605] Weiss RA, Dover JS: Leg vein management: sclerotherapy, ambulatory phlebectomy, and laser surgery. Semin Cutaneous Med Surg 21:76, 2002 [PMID 11911538] For more information, visit http://www.acssurgery.com.
|
Drugs Blocking the Renin-Angiotensin System Offer Advantages Beyond Lowering
Blood Pressure
In the past 7 days, 232 papers and articles pertaining to General Medicine were added to the DG database. For a full list click here.
Papers and articles, pertaining to General Medicine, most read by your colleagues in the past 3 months
|
||||||||||||||
|
Despite the high incidence of osteoporosis and its associated fragility
fractures in postmenopausal women, it is estimated that < 20% of women
receive appropriate, guideline-recommended screening for the disorder. Medical
oncologists and other healthcare professionals treating patients with breast
cancer should be particularly alert to this problem, as many patients receive
treatments that may increase their lifetime risk of developing osteoporosis and
fracture. Toward that end, the third in our series of Expert Columns, authored by Peter M. Ravdin, MD, PhD, Professor of Medicine at the University of Texas Health Science Center in San Antonio, reviews the current screening and treatment recommendations for osteoporosis, with an emphasis on how a history of breast cancer affects both the risk and the treatment options for the disorder. We hope you enjoy this newsletter, and that you join us every 2 months as we examine key issues in the hormonal treatment of breast cancer. Expert Column — Managing the Risk of Osteoporosis and Fracture in Women With a History of Breast Cancer Peter M. Ravdin, MD, PhD, of the University of Texas Health Science Center, reviews the current screening and treatment guidelines for osteoporosis and explores the effect of breast cancer therapies on osteoporosis risk and treatment options. Brief Commentary — International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer Kathleen I. Pritchard, MD, of the Toronto Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre reviews the treatment guidelines released by the International Consensus Panel on primary therapy of early breast cancer, as developed at the 8th International Conference on Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer held March 2003 in St. Gallen, Switzerland. Ask the Experts — Hormonal Treatment for Recurrent ER-Negative, PR-Positive Breast Cancer? A 62-year-old woman with a 4-cm lobular carcinoma underwent radical mastectomy followed by chemotherapy and 5 years of tamoxifen. One year later, a 1.8-cm, ER-negative, PR-positive, node-negative tumor was found in the contralateral breast. Clifford Hudis, MD, of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York, evaluates her case and suggests a course of therapy. Ask the Experts — Follow-up Surveillance for Localized Breast Tumor? A 48-year-old woman underwent mastectomy for an ER-positive, PR-positive, 2.5-cm tumor of the right breast with no nodal involvement, received 6 courses of FAC, and started tamoxifen. Joseph Sparano, MD, of the Montefiore Medical Center in New York, discusses the current recommendations for follow-up evaluation. MEDLINE Abstract Collection — Treatment of Advanced Breast Cancer This collection of MEDLINE abstracts includes the most recent clinical trials and reviews on the latest chemotherapy and hormonal treatment options for advanced breast cancer. |
|||||||||||||||
|
Drug halts progress of "mad cow disease" in UK man Last Updated: 2003-09-26 15:14:36 -0400 (Reuters Health) BELFAST (Reuters) - An experimental treatment given to a Northern Irish teenager has halted the progress of brain damage caused by the human form of mad cow disease, medical experts studying his case said on Friday. Jonathan Simms, 19, from Belfast, is the first person to have pentosan polysulphate (PPS) injected into his brain in an attempt to slow the damage caused by variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (vCJD). "Here we have a kid who had gone down and down and down, now he's put all the weight he had lost back on, his heart rate is back up to normal," said Stephen Dealler, a consultant microbiologist at the Royal Lancaster Infirmary in England. "It is one case, and you can't go round saying we have the answer, but it has justified large amounts of work to go ahead to find out what was really going on, to find out why the drug appeared to have such an effect and which way to go from here." He was speaking after experts from several countries gathered at a Belfast hotel for a case conference organised by the teenager's father Don Simms to discuss whether PPS has been effective in stabilising Jonathan and prolonging his life. Although Jonathan remains confined to bed with limited ability to move or interact with those around him, Don Simms said he had seen "small but significant" improvements since winning the right to give his son the experimental treatment. "He's not dead, that's the most significant thing. His swallow has increased, so that he can deal with his own secretion of saliva, which is a big thing for CJD sufferers," he told Reuters. "He's living 10 months longer than the average, I was told he had a year by two experts, in two different countries." There is no cure for vCJD, which is fatal and has been linked to eating meat from cattle infected with Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE), also known as mad cow disease. LEGAL BATTLE Doctors began giving Jonathan the drug, commonly used to treat cystitis, after his family won a legal battle last December. Health officials needed court permission as the treatment had not been tested on humans and the disease had left Jonathan incapable of deciding for himself. "I'm not a salesman for PPS, that's entirely up to other families," said Simms, when asked if he thought the drug should be made available to other sufferers. "But the information we have now - no one had that - and I don't want those other families, if they wish to have the compound, to have to jump the same hurdles as we did." Doctors and scientists at Friday's conference said more research was needed to confirm PPS as a treatment for vCJD, but believed it should be given to more sufferers. "I am absolutely convinced, as a scientist, that if Jonathan had been treated earlier we would not see Jonathan in as poor a state as he is now," said Chris Pomfrett, a lecturer in neurophysiology at Manchester University, in northern England. "The delay that happened with Jonathan must not be allowed to happen to others." Jonathan's family doctor, Mark McClean, said he was frustrated the drug had not been administered when his family first requested it in March 2002. "Given the choice between certain death in a matter of weeks or months, and treatment, albeit experimental, which could have even a one-in-a-million chance of halting the disease, there's no choice. I would choose the treatment," he said. "In our study, of one, admittedly, against all the experts advice we proved it has been safe... and it has been effective in halting the disease, and perhaps improving his state of mind." Britain destroyed 3.7 million cattle in the 1980s and 1990s because of BSE. There have been nearly 120 confirmed or probable deaths in Britain from vCJD. |
Diabetes and cancer: an unexpected linkAntidiabetes drugs may also help in the treatment of some forms of cancer |
By Andrea RinaldiAn intriguing study in the September 24 Journal of Biology—published by BioMed Central, a sister company of The Scientist—suggests there could be a previously unrecognized anticancer benefit from treatment with some common antidiabetic drugs. Simon A. Hawley and colleagues at the University of Dundee show how the tumor suppressor protein kinase LKB1 is linked to AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), the target enzyme for several drugs commonly used to treat type 2 diabetes (Journal of Biology, 2:28, September 24, 2003). AMPK acts as a "metabolic master switch," reducing glucose levels and inhibiting biosynthetic pathways and cell proliferation. A lack of, or a mutation in, the LKB1 gene gives rise to Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, an autosomal dominant human disorder in which the risk of developing malignant tumors in some tissues is 15-fold higher than normal. Both the activation pattern of AMPK and the LKB1 substrate have been poorly understood, but recent observations suggest that the latter is associated with a group of accessory proteins known as STRADα/β and MO25α/β, which increase the kinase activity of LKB1. Hawley et al. purified two forms of AMPK from rat liver and observed that both fractions contained LKB1, STRADα, and MO25α and that the AMPK activity could be immunoprecipitated using anti-LKB1 antibodies. Recombinant LKB1–STRADα/β –MO25α/β complexes fully activated AMPK in cell-free assays, providing further support for the idea that the link between AMPK and LKB1 has a functional background. In addition, the authors demonstrated that LKB1-mediated activation of AMPK also takes place in vivo in HEK-293T cells, but not in HeLa cells (which don't express LKB1 and therefore represents a natural knockout cell line). In HeLa cells, activation was achieved by stably expressing recombinant LKB1. This suggests that the tumor-suppressing properties of LKB1 may depend on its ability to activate AMPK. "Our findings provide strong evidence that LKB1–STRAD–MO25 complexes represent the major upstream kinases acting on AMPK, although they do not rule out the possibility that the complex might contain additional components," conclude the authors. Having established the LKB1–AMPK connection, Hawley et al. attempted to verify if antidiabetic drugs targeting AMPK by increasing its enzymatic activity could be affected by LKB1 in vivo. They observed that metformin—the most widely used diabetes drug in the world—could not activate AMPK in HeLa cells, presumably since they lack LKB1, and that expression of recombinant LKB1 restored the ability of HeLa cells to respond to the drug. The authors speculate that metformin, and possibly other diabetes drugs, may work by directly activating LKB1, which in turn activates AMPK, leading to glucose sequestration—with immediate benefits for those with diabetes—and to inhibition of cell growth and division, which ultimately prevent tumor development and proliferation. Links for this article
S.A. Hawley et al., "Complexes between the LKBI tumor suppressor, STRADα/β and MO25α/β are upstream kinases in the AMP-activated protein kinase cascade," Journal of Biology, 2:28, September 24, 2003. http://jbiol.com/content/2/4/28 University of Dundee http://www.dundee.ac.uk/ A. Hemminki, "The molecular basis and clinical aspects of Peutz-Jeghers syndrome," Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 55:735-750, May 1999. [PubMed Abstract] J. Boudeau et al., "MO25α/β interact with STRADα/β enhancing their ability to bind, activate and localise LKB1 in the cytoplasm," European Molecular Biology Organization Journal, 22:5102-5114, October 1, 2003. http://emboj.oupjournals.org/ New birth control to limit women's periodsBy Amy Cox Seasonale, approved by the Food and Drug Administration on Friday, would reduce the number of women's periods to four a year by taking the hormones generally found in conventional birth control pills, but for longer spans of time. Seasonale would be another alternative for women seeking birth control, said an official with the pill's manufacturer, Barr Laboratories. "For women who desire prevention of pregnancy and are comfortable taking a hormonal contraceptive, then this gives them an option," says Dr. Carole Ben-Maimon, president and COO of Barr Research. "We see it as a [choice] for those wanting the convenience." First introduced in the 1960s, the most common birth control pills combine the hormones estrogen and progestin for use for three weeks followed by a week of placebos to allow a woman to have her period. Seasonale, however, uses the same types of hormones but for 12 weeks straight before a week of placebos. Not having as many periods -- and the medical problems surrounding them -- has some women intrigued. Kelley Barclay joined more than 1,400 women in a clinical trial of Seasonale because her monthly period plagued her with cramps, mood swings and pain. "My mood swings were not at all like they had been before, not at all severe, and my pain was not at the level that it had been before I started Seasonale," she explains. Almost 39 million women in the United States use some kind of birth control, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation. The most common reversible method is oral contraceptives, in use by an estimated 25 percent of women who use birth control. The technique of taking birth control pills continuously to keep from having a period isn't new. For instance, Dr. Carolyn Westhoff, an obstetrician-gynecologist at Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center in New York, has been using regular packs of birth control pills back-to-back to skip her period for about 10 years. "It's really terrific not to have the bleeding, not to have the cramps, not to have some of those symptoms that lead up to a period," she says. "And I think many women will be really eager to trade in 14 a year for four a year." Westhoff, not associated with the clinical trials, had said she would prescribe Seasonale to her patients if it won FDA approval. "Using Seasonale, ... I think mainly is going to add a lot of convenience for women and freedom from the symptoms they have with their periods." But Dr. Susan Rako -- author of "No More Periods?" -- argues that there are good medical reasons for a woman to have a period. "Bleeding is the only way our bodies can rid themselves of excess stored iron, and excess stored iron is another risk factor for heart attack and strokes," Rako says. "And that's why in their menstrual years, women have fewer heart attacks and strokes than men." Rako said other issues are raised, too, when considering period suppression. "We're not just talking about doing away with menstruation," she says. "We're talking about doing away with women's normal hormonal menstrual cycle, which is really responsible for what fundamentally makes a woman a woman." Barr's Ben-Maimon says that Seasonale is as effective at preventing pregnancy as other oral contraceptive products. The failure rate for traditional birth control pills is around 1 to 2 percent with perfect use, according to the FDA. Some women should not use birth control pills, including those who smoke cigarettes, particularly if they're older than 35. There is a slight increase in risk for blood clots and high blood pressure
|
Venous thrombosis risk lower with transdermal rather than oral ERTLast Updated: 2003-09-26 12:30:05 -0400 (Reuters Health) NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Unlike transdermal estrogen replacement therapy (ERT), oral ERT induces activated protein C (APC) resistance, a risk factor for venous thromboembolism, and activates blood coagulation, according to a randomized study conducted in France. "This randomized trial highlights the importance of the route of estrogen administration in prescribing postmenopausal hormone therapy," Dr. Emmanuel Oger from Dandenong Hospital in Victoria, Australia, told Reuters Health. Oral ERT is known to raise the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), but less is known about the effects of transdermal estrogen, he and his colleagues write in the September issue of Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology: Journal of the American Heart Association. To investigate, they randomly assigned 196 postmenopausal women to placebo or to oral estradiol (1 mg/d) or transdermal estradiol (50 µg/d), both combined with oral micronized progesterone (100 mg/d) for 6 months. Oral but not transdermal ERT significantly altered the effect of APC on thrombin generation (ETP-based assay), "leading to an acquired APC resistance," the team reports. Moreover, after 6 months, plasma prothrombin fragment 1+2 levels, a marker of coagulation activity, were significantly higher in the oral estrogen arm than in the transdermal or placebo arms and were positively and significantly correlated with changes in ETP-based assay. "Taken together, these data provide a plausible biologic mechanism to the clearly demonstrated association between oral estrogen and venous thrombosis," the team writes. Furthermore, Dr. Oger said, the study adds to a "strong body of biological evidence that suggests a lower risk for venous thrombosis, if any, among users of the [estrogen] skin patch." For example, in a case-control study published in The Lancet in August, current oral ERT users were 4 times more likely to develop VTE than current transdermal ERT users (See Reuters Health report Aug. 7, 2003). "Whether transdermal ERT is a safe option for the relief of severe climacteric symptoms needs further investigation that our study might well stimulate," Dr. Oger and colleagues conclude. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2003;23:1671-1676.
|
||||||||||||||
Internal Mammary Sentinel Nodes in Primary Breast Cancer
Curr Med Res Opin 19(6):567-569, 2003. © 2003 Librapharm Limited
Posted 09/16/2003
For over a century, there has been considerable interest in the management of regional lymph node metastasis in patients with primary breast cancer. Since the advent of sentinel lymph node biopsies, there has been renewed interest in the management of patients with metastasis to the internal mammary nodes. The appropriate management of these patients has not yet been established. Some investigators propose that biopsy of the internal mammary sentinel node may provide additional prognostic information which might be used to guide the administration of systemic adjuvant therapy. Additionally, it has been suggested that patients with metastasis to the internal mammary sentinel node may benefit from radiotherapy to the internal mammary nodal chain. Clinical trials are needed to resolve these issues. Internal mammary sentinel node biopsy in patients with primary breast cancer should be considered investigational, and conducted only in the context of clinical trials.
About 100 years ago, William Halsted presented his hypothesis concerning the natural history of breast cancer.[1,2] He proposed that breast cancer spreads in an orderly fashion, first to the regional lymph nodes and then distant sites. Little importance was paid to blood-borne metastasis. Halsted argued that breast cancer was curable if the tumour and regional nodes were excised in a timely manner. There were two important corollaries to his hypothesis. First, he and his disciples maintained that resection of a node-negative cancer was curative, believing that such tumours were excised before spread to the regional lymph nodes occurred. Secondly, an extensive lymphadenectomy was considered essential for cure.[3] If a patient with node-negative cancer developed distant relapse, it was often argued that more extensive lymphadenectomy might have uncovered metastatic nodes that could have prevented the distant spread of the disease.
During the last 30 years, the results of several studies appear to have refuted the Halsted paradigm. Two large randomised prospective trials, the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project -04 (NSABP-04) and the King's/Cambridge trials, have shown that delayed treatment of the axillary nodes (either by surgery or radiotherapy) has no impact on mortality.[4,5] Other studies have shown that more extensive lymph node dissections (such as extirpation of the internal mammary or supraclavicular nodes in addition to the axillary nodes) do not improve outcome.[6-8] As a result, a new paradigm emerged in the late 20th century.[9] Breast cancer was no longer considered a locally progressive disease, as envisioned by Halsted. Rather, it was considered a systemic disease at time of inception. Under this new paradigm, great importance is attached to blood-borne metastasis. More importantly, metastases to the regional lymph nodes are considered indicators of poor prognosis rather than the nidus for the distant spread of disease. Recently, we reported results that further support this new paradigm.[10] We studied a large database of patients to determine if there is any correlation between nodal status at initial diagnosis and the interval of time from first relapse to death. Our study showed that patients with more than three involved lymph nodes had a shorter lifespan after relapse than those with no nodal involvement. Thus, we proposed that nodal status is primarily a marker of tumour biology, rather than a predictor of tumour chronology as suggested by Halsted.
Recently, the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been popularised as a means of staging patients with primary breast cancer.[11] This new technology has led some investigators to once again consider the tenets of the Halsted paradigm. The intended goal of the SLNB is to avoid the morbidity of an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients who have no metastasis to the sentinel node. The sentinel lymph node is the first node to receive lymphatic drainage from a tumour and the surgeon identifies it by injecting blue dye or radioactive colloid either intradermally or around the tumour. If the sentinel lymph node is free of tumour, it is assumed that all other nodes in the basin are also free, and ALND can be avoided. Alternatively, involvement of the sentinel node may indicate that other nodes in the basin are involved, and most surgeons will then proceed with lymph node dissection. The overall long-term effects on survival, local recurrence and morbidity of omitting ALND in sentinel lymph node negative patients have not been elucidated, and several large randomised prospective trials are currently underway to address these issues.[12]
The advent of SLNB has generated considerable interest in the potential significance of metastasis to the internal mammary nodes (IMN).[13] In patients with primary breast cancer, the internal mammary nodal chain is the most important drainage site outside the axilla. When radiocolloid is used to guide SLNB, metastasis to the IMN has been reported in about 27% of all patients with primary breast cancer, with about 7% having metastasis to the IMN and not to the axillary nodes.[14] Thus, the SLNB technique has re-kindled interest in the management of metastasis to the IMN, even though prior studies seemed to suggest that dissection of the IMN offered no survival advantage. This renewed interest has partly been fuelled by evidence from recent randomised trials showing that postmastectomy radiation (that includes the internal mammary field) does indeed reduce mortality.[15-17] Additionally, some investigators have suggested that biopsy of sentinel nodes in the internal mammary chain may provide additional prognostic information, which could be used to guide the administration of systemic adjuvant therapy.[18]
Yet, there are several controversial issues concerning metastasis to the IMN. In a large series from Milan, the 10-year survival of patients with metastasis to either the axillary or IMN was equivalent(54.6% and 53%, respectively), although metastasis to both nodal groups resulted in a 10-year survival rate of only 30%.[19] In contrast, a study from the University of Chicago showed that patients with IMN metastasis had a worse prognosis, regardless of axillary node status.[20] Additionally, there is controversy as to whether tumours on the medial aspect of the breast are more likely to metastasise to the IMN, when compared to those on the lateral aspect.[20] Some studies suggest that they are, while others fail to find any correlation.[20,21] A recent study suggests that breast cancer patients with medial tumours have a greater risk of relapse and death when compared to those with lateral tumours, but it is not clear if this is due to the occult spread of disease to the IMNs.[22] Finally, it is still not clear if radiotherapy to the IMN (in those patients with involved IMN nodes) results in better overall survival. Although large, randomised trials have shown that post-mastectomy radiation improves outcome in patients with metastasis to the axillary nodes, the precise mechanism of this benefit has not been elucidated.[15,16]
Metastases to the internal mammary nodes are generally located in the first or second intercostal spaces. Thus, the internal mammary sentinel node can easily be excised through a small incision overlying the intercostal space. The procedure is associated with much less morbidity than dissection of the internal mammary nodal chain. This raises an important question. Should surgeons routinely excise internal mammary sentinel nodes? At the present time, this seems unwarranted, as we still do not know if information gathered from internal mammary sentinel node biopsy will improve outcome in patients with primary breast cancer. Although such information might be used to guide the administration of systemic therapy or direct radiation therapy to the IMN chain, clinical trials are needed to determine if this has any impact on mortality. Therefore, internal mammary sentinel node biopsies should be regarded as investigational, and only performed in a clinical trial setting. Indeed, sentinel node biopsies of the axilla should also be regarded as investigational, as clinical trials comparing it to standard axillary lymph node dissection have still not reported results.
In patients with primary breast cancer, the management of regional lymph nodes has been the subject of intense controversy for over a century. Randomised controlled trials have made enormous contributions to our understanding of the significance of nodal metastasis. As we develop more experience with the SLNB, new controversies will undoubtedly arise.[23] These controversies can only be resolved through the thoughtful design of new clinical trials and the recruitment of large numbers of patients into these trials.
Address for correspondence: Dr Ismail Jatoi, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA. email ismail.jatoi@us.army.mil
American
Academy of Allergy Asthma & Immunology
American Academy of Child &
Adolescent Psychiatry
American Academy of Dermatology
American Academy of Emergency
Medicine
American Academy of Facial Plastic
and Reconstructive Surgery
American Academy of Family Physicians
American
Academy of Insurance Medicine
American Academy of Neurology
American Academy of
Ophthalmology
American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
American Academy of
Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
American Academy of Pain
Medicine
American Academy of Pediatrics
American Academy of Physical
Medicine & Rehabilitation
American Association for Thoracic
Surgery
American Association of Clinical
Endocrinologists
American Association of Neurological
Surgeons
American Association of Public Health
Physicians
American College of Cardiology
American College of Chest
Physicians
American College of Emergency Physicians
American College of
Gastroenterology
American College of Obstetricians and
Gynecologists
American College of Occupational and Environmental
Medicine
American College of Physicians - American
Society of Internal Medicine
American College of Radiation Oncology
American College of
Radiology
American College of Rheumatology
American College of
Surgeons
American Gastroenterological
Association
American Medical Association
American Orthopaedic Foot and
Ankle Society
American Orthopaedic Society for Sports
Medicine
American Psychiatric Association
American Sleep
Disorders Association
American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
(ASAPS)
American Society for Dermatologic
Surgery
American Society for Gastrointestinal
Endoscopy
American Society for Reproductive
Medicine
American Society for Surgery of the
Hand
American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and
Oncology
American Society of Abdominal
Surgeons
American Society of Addiction Medicine
American Society of
Anesthesiologists
American Society of Bariatric Physicians
American Society of
Cataract and Refractive Surgery
American Society of Clinical Oncology
American Society of
Clinical Pathologists
American Society of Colon and Rectal
Surgeons
American Society of Hematology
American
Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons
American Thoracic
Society
American Urological Association, Inc.
College of American
Pathologists
The Endocrine Society
National Consortium
Resident Organizations
National MedPeds Residents'
Association
Radiological Society of North America
Society of American
Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons
Society of Cardiovascular & Interventional
Radiology
Society of Nuclear Medicine
Society of Thoracic
Surgeons